Project Inclusion Criteria

New cases will be considered for inclusion in solutions4inclusion if they provide:-

Examples of projects that utilise technology either directly or indirectly to improve the lives and life chances of disadvantaged people and the places in which they live.

Cases must be relevant and significant . Wherever possible cases should be up-to-date, still operating and relevant. Projects that have ceased operating will be considered for inclusion if they provide a useful or significant demonstration of the use of technology, inclusion of these cases will be more useful if reasons for failure or cessation are known. Cases should be of significant size or importance, at a minimum affecting at least ten individuals or households.

Cases should be replicable. Except in exceptional circumstances (probably concerning resources, partners or the local environment) cases should be capable of replication and as much detail as possible should be provided to assist readers to understand resource and implementation requirements. Contact details for further enquiries should be provided.

Wherever possible evidence should be provided to assess the impact and outputs from the case. The benefits and beneficiaries of the case should be identified.

The case must meet acceptable standards of literacy and coherence and be written in plain English. Poorly written cases will not be accepted.

Authors submitting cases for inclusion must provide an assurance that the work is not an infringement of copyright and that they will indemnify those developing solutions4inclusion against any breach of such a warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, submissions might need to become the legal copyright of those developing solutions4inclusion.